Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) vs Gemma 3n E4B Instruct
Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) vs Gemma 3n E4B Instruct. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) | Gemma 3n E4B Instruct | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 56.0 | 4.8 | −91.4% Gemma 3n E4B Instruct is 91.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $4,056.65 | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 123.06s | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | — | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-xhigh/gemma-3n-e4b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-xhigh/gemma-3n-e4b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill