Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) vs Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)
Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) vs Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) | Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 56.0 | 16.7 | −70.2% Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reas… is 70.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $4,056.65 | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 125.20s | 27.17s | −78.3% Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reas… is 78.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $0.10 / $0.34 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-xhigh/gemma-4-26b-a4b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-xhigh/gemma-4-26b-a4b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill