Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) vs GLM-4.6V (Reasoning)
Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) vs GLM-4.6V (Reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) | GLM-4.6V (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 56.0 | 11.2 | −80.0% GLM-4.6V (Reasoning) is 80.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $4,056.65 | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 125.20s | 32.97s | −73.7% GLM-4.6V (Reasoning) is 73.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $0.30 / $0.90 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-xhigh/glm-4-6v-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-xhigh/glm-4-6v-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill