Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) vs GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Depends on your budget
Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallbac… scores 37.5 points higher (56.0 vs 18.5) but costs 212× as much to run the benchmark ($4057 vs $19.2; flagship vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallbac… when you need intelligence above 18.5, and GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) when 18.5 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) | GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 56.0 | 18.5 | −67.0% GPT-6 Luna (Non-reaso… is 67.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $4,056.65 | $19.16 | −99.5% GPT-6 Luna (Non-reaso… is 99.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 127.76s | 5.05s | −96.0% GPT-6 Luna (Non-reaso… is 96.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) vs Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback): 67.0% less intelligence, 99.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 96.0% faster end-to-end.
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
Compare something else
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-xhigh/gpt-6-luna-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-xhigh/gpt-6-luna-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill