Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Depends on your budget
Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallbac… scores 30.0 points higher (56.0 vs 26.0) but costs 18× as much to run the benchmark ($4057 vs $231; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallbac… when you need intelligence above 26.0, and MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) when 26.0 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) | MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 56.0 | 26.0 | −53.6% MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reason… is 53.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $4,056.65 | $231.08 | −94.3% MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reason… is 94.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 127.76s | 49.47s | −61.3% MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reason… is 61.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $0.41 / $1.02 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) vs Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback): 53.6% less intelligence, 94.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 61.3% faster end-to-end.
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Compare something else
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-xhigh/mimo-v2-5-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-xhigh/mimo-v2-5-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill