Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) vs Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallbac… scores 22.3 points higher (56.0 vs 33.7) but costs 2.3× as much to run the benchmark ($4057 vs $1737; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallbac… when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh).
| Metric | Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) | Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 56.0 | 33.7 | −39.8% Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is 39.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $4,056.65 | $1,737.18 | −57.2% Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is 57.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 123.06s | 19.50s | −84.2% Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is 84.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) vs Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback): 39.8% less intelligence, 57.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 84.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback)Muse Spark 1.1 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-xhigh/muse-spark-1-1 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-xhigh/muse-spark-1-1?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill