Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallbac… scores 7.9 points higher (56.0 vs 48.1) but costs 2.0× as much to run the benchmark ($4057 vs $2000; both flagship class). Pick Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallbac… when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Muse Spark 1.3 (Max).
| Metric | Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) | Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 56.0 | 48.1 | −14.1% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 14.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $4,056.65 | $2,000.35 | −50.7% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 50.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 115.71s | 59.49s | −48.6% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 48.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) vs Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback): 14.1% less intelligence, 50.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 48.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback)Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-xhigh/muse-spark-1-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-xhigh/muse-spark-1-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill