Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Depends on your budget
Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallbac… scores 29.5 points higher (56.0 vs 26.5) but costs 14× as much to run the benchmark ($4057 vs $283; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallbac… when you need intelligence above 26.5, and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL when 26.5 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 56.0 | 26.5 | −52.7% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 52.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $4,056.65 | $282.51 | −93.0% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 93.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 127.77s | 6.35s | −95.0% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 95.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $0.23 / $0.57 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback): 52.7% less intelligence, 93.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 95.0% faster end-to-end.
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Compare something else
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-xhigh/nemotron-3-5-super-vl · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-xhigh/nemotron-3-5-super-vl?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill