Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) vs Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2)

Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) vs Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback)On the frontier
Intelligence
56.00
Total cost
$4057
Multiverse ComputingQuasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
26.70
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback)Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)56.026.7−52.3% Quasar 438B (Max, Bas… is 52.3% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$4,056.65Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)123.06s15.88s−87.1% Quasar 438B (Max, Bas… is 87.1% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$4.00 / $20.0$0.11 / $0.33
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback): what beats itQuasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-xhigh/quasar-438b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5-xhigh/quasar-438b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill