Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) vs EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning)

Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) vs EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback)On the frontier
Intelligence
57.60
Total cost
$8708
LG AI ResearchEXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
8.20
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback)EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)57.68.2−85.8% EXAONE 4.0 32B (Reaso… is 85.8% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$8,708.20Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)626.13sNot reported— not comparable
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$4.00 / $20.0—
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback): what beats itEXAONE 4.0 32B (Reasoning): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5/exaone-4-0-32b-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5/exaone-4-0-32b-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill