Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) vs Gemma 3n E4B Instruct

Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) vs Gemma 3n E4B Instruct. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback)On the frontier
Intelligence
57.60
Total cost
$8708
GoogleGemma 3n E4B InstructNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
4.80
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback)Gemma 3n E4B InstructDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)57.64.8−91.7% Gemma 3n E4B Instruct is 91.7% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$8,708.20Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)626.13sNot reported— not comparable
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$4.00 / $20.0—
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback): what beats itGemma 3n E4B Instruct: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5/gemma-3n-e4b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5/gemma-3n-e4b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill