Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) vs GLM-4.7 (Non-reasoning)
Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) vs GLM-4.7 (Non-reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) | GLM-4.7 (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 57.6 | 17.4 | −69.8% GLM-4.7 (Non-reasonin… is 69.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $8,708.20 | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 626.13s | 15.73s | −97.5% GLM-4.7 (Non-reasonin… is 97.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $0.53 / $2.10 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5/glm-4-7-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5/glm-4-7-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill