Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) vs Granite 4.2 8B
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or Granite 4.2 8B by IBM? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) scores 46.5 points higher (57.6 vs 11.1) but costs 164× as much to run the benchmark ($8708 vs $53.1; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) when you need intelligence above 11.1, and Granite 4.2 8B when 11.1 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) | Granite 4.2 8B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 57.6 | 11.1 | −80.7% Granite 4.2 8B is 80.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $8,708.20 | $53.07 | −99.4% Granite 4.2 8B is 99.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 670.18s | 52.08s | −92.2% Granite 4.2 8B is 92.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $0.06 / $0.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Granite 4.2 8B vs Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback): 80.7% less intelligence, 99.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 92.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Granite 4.2 8B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (High) scores 32.90 for $47.9.
Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback)Granite 4.2 8BToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5/granite-4-2-8b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5/granite-4-2-8b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill