Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) vs LFM2.5-2.6B

Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) vs LFM2.5-2.6B. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback)On the frontier
Intelligence
57.60
Total cost
$8708
Liquid AILFM2.5-2.6BNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
8.40
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback)LFM2.5-2.6BDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)57.68.4−85.4% LFM2.5-2.6B is 85.4% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$8,708.20Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)626.13sNot reported— not comparable
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$4.00 / $20.0—
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback): what beats itLFM2.5-2.6B: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5/lfm2-5-2-6b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5/lfm2-5-2-6b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill