Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) vs Ling 3.0 Flash

Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) vs Ling 3.0 Flash. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback)On the frontier
Intelligence
57.60
Total cost
$8708
InclusionAILing 3.0 FlashNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
20.10
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback)Ling 3.0 FlashDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)57.620.1−65.1% Ling 3.0 Flash is 65.1% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$8,708.20Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)670.18s11.78s−98.2% Ling 3.0 Flash is 98.2% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$4.00 / $20.0$0.07 / $0.22
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback): what beats itLing 3.0 Flash: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5/ling-3-0-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5/ling-3-0-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill