Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) vs Ling-flash-2.0

Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) vs Ling-flash-2.0. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback)On the frontier
Intelligence
57.60
Total cost
$8708
InclusionAILing-flash-2.0Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.80
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback)Ling-flash-2.0Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)57.67.8−86.5% Ling-flash-2.0 is 86.5% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$8,708.20Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)626.13s112.62s−82.0% Ling-flash-2.0 is 82.0% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$4.00 / $20.0$0.14 / $0.57
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback): what beats itLing-flash-2.0: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5/ling-flash-2-0 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5/ling-flash-2-0?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill