Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) vs Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) scores 23.9 points higher (57.6 vs 33.7) but costs 6.5× as much to run the benchmark ($8708 vs $1336; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) when you need intelligence above 33.7, and Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) when 33.7 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) | Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 57.6 | 33.7 | −41.5% Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is 41.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $8,708.20 | $1,336.09 | −84.7% Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is 84.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 699.02s | 60.72s | −91.3% Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is 91.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $0.50 / $3.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) vs Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback): 41.5% less intelligence, 84.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 91.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback)Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5/qwen3-8-27b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5/qwen3-8-27b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill