Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) vs Solar Pro 3
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) by Anthropic or Solar Pro 3 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) scores 49.8 points higher (57.6 vs 7.8) but costs 55× as much to run the benchmark ($8708 vs $159; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) when you need intelligence above 7.8, and Solar Pro 3 when 7.8 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) | Solar Pro 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 57.6 | 7.8 | −86.5% Solar Pro 3 is 86.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $8,708.20 | $159.22 | −98.2% Solar Pro 3 is 98.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 643.67s | 18.88s | −97.1% Solar Pro 3 is 97.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Solar Pro 3 vs Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback): 86.5% less intelligence, 98.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 97.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Solar Pro 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback)Solar Pro 3Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5/solar-pro-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-5/solar-pro-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill