Claude Opus 5 (High) vs Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 5 (High) by Anthropic or Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh) by Anthropic? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh) scores 1.6 points higher (49.7 vs 48.1) but costs 1.4× as much to run the benchmark ($5868 vs $4332; both flagship class). Pick Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Claude Opus 5 (High).
| Metric | Claude Opus 5 (High) | Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 48.1 | 49.7 | +3.3% Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh) is 3.3% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $4,331.68 | $5,867.76 | +35.5% Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh) is 35.5% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 20.99s | 35.31s | +68.2% Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh) is 68.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $5.00 / $25.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh) vs Claude Opus 5 (High): 3.3% more intelligence, 35.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 68.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 5 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Claude Opus 5 (High)Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-high/claude-opus-5-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-high/claude-opus-5-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill