Claude Opus 5 (Low) vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 5 (Low) by Anthropic or Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Opus 5 (Low) scores 23.8 points higher (39.4 vs 15.6) but costs 10× as much to run the benchmark ($1561 vs $156; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Opus 5 (Low) when you need intelligence above 15.6, and Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite when 15.6 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5 (Low) | Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.4 | 15.6 | −60.4% Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is 60.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,560.91 | $155.87 | −90.0% Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is 90.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.45s | 6.09s | −46.8% Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is 46.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $0.25 / $1.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs Claude Opus 5 (Low): 60.4% less intelligence, 90.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 46.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 5 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
Claude Opus 5 (Low)Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-low/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-low/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill