Claude Opus 5 (Low) vs Gemini 4 Argon (High)
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 5 (Low) by Anthropic or Gemini 4 Argon (High) by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 4 Argon (High) scores 13.2 points higher (52.6 vs 39.4) but costs 1.5× as much to run the benchmark ($2407 vs $1561; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Gemini 4 Argon (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Claude Opus 5 (Low).
| Metric | Claude Opus 5 (Low) | Gemini 4 Argon (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.4 | 52.6 | +33.5% Gemini 4 Argon (High) is 33.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,560.91 | $2,407.24 | +54.2% Gemini 4 Argon (High) is 54.2% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.44s | 63.35s | +453.8% Gemini 4 Argon (High) is 453.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Gemini 4 Argon (High) vs Claude Opus 5 (Low): 33.5% more intelligence, 54.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 453.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 5 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Gemini 4 Argon (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
Claude Opus 5 (Low)Gemini 4 Argon (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-low/gemini-4-argon · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-low/gemini-4-argon?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill