Claude Opus 5 (Low) vs GLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning)

Claude Opus 5 (Low) vs GLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Opus 5 (Low)Off the frontier
Intelligence
39.40
Total cost
$1561
Z AIGLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
14.90
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Opus 5 (Low)GLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)39.414.9−62.2% GLM-4.6 (Non-reasonin… is 62.2% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$1,560.91Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)11.44s19.63s+71.6% GLM-4.6 (Non-reasonin… is 71.6% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$5.00 / $25.0$0.57 / $2.20
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Opus 5 (Low): what beats itGLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-low/glm-4-6 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-low/glm-4-6?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill