Claude Opus 5 (Low) vs GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)
Claude Opus 5 (Low) vs GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5 (Low) | GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.4 | 22.4 | −43.1% GLM-5.2 (Non-reasonin… is 43.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,560.91 | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.44s | 3.90s | −65.9% GLM-5.2 (Non-reasonin… is 65.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $1.40 / $4.40 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-low/glm-5-2-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-low/glm-5-2-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill