Claude Opus 5 (Low) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 5 (Low) by Anthropic or GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh)
GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) vs Claude Opus 5 (Low): 29.4% more intelligence, 57.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 632.1% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5 (Low) | GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.4 | 51.0 | +29.4% GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) is 29.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,560.91 | $662.28 | −57.6% GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) is 57.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.79s | 86.31s | +632.1% GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) is 632.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 5 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Claude Opus 5 (Low)GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-low/gpt-6-1-sol-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-low/gpt-6-1-sol-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill