Claude Opus 5 (Low) vs Grok 4.5 (High)
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 5 (Low) by Anthropic or Grok 4.5 (High) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Opus 5 (Low) scores 0.6 points higher (39.4 vs 38.8) but costs 1.3× as much to run the benchmark ($1561 vs $1244; both premium class). Pick Claude Opus 5 (Low) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Grok 4.5 (High).
| Metric | Claude Opus 5 (Low) | Grok 4.5 (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.4 | 38.8 | −1.5% Grok 4.5 (High) is 1.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,560.91 | $1,243.85 | −20.3% Grok 4.5 (High) is 20.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.44s | 19.24s | +68.2% Grok 4.5 (High) is 68.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Grok 4.5 (High) vs Claude Opus 5 (Low): 1.5% less intelligence, 20.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 68.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 5 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Grok 4.5 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Claude Opus 5 (Low)Grok 4.5 (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-low/grok-4-5 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-low/grok-4-5?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill