Claude Opus 5 (Low) vs Ministral 3 14B
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 5 (Low) by Anthropic or Ministral 3 14B by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Opus 5 (Low) scores 33.4 points higher (39.4 vs 6.0) but costs 42× as much to run the benchmark ($1561 vs $37.6; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Opus 5 (Low) when you need intelligence above 6.0, and Ministral 3 14B when 6.0 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5 (Low) | Ministral 3 14B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.4 | 6.0 | −84.8% Ministral 3 14B is 84.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,560.91 | $37.56 | −97.6% Ministral 3 14B is 97.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.31s | 7.92s | −30.0% Ministral 3 14B is 30.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $0.20 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Ministral 3 14B vs Claude Opus 5 (Low): 84.8% less intelligence, 97.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 30.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 5 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Ministral 3 14B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
Claude Opus 5 (Low)Ministral 3 14BToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-low/ministral-3-14b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-low/ministral-3-14b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill