Claude Opus 5 (Low) vs Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 5 (Low) by Anthropic or Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh)
Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) vs Claude Opus 5 (Low): 0.5% more intelligence, 11.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 81.2% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5 (Low) | Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.4 | 39.6 | +0.5% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 0.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,560.91 | $1,385.40 | −11.2% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 11.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.37s | 20.60s | +81.2% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 81.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 5 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Claude Opus 5 (Low)Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-low/muse-spark-1-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-low/muse-spark-1-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill