Claude Opus 5 (Low) vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 5 (Low) by Anthropic or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Opus 5 (Low) scores 12.9 points higher (39.4 vs 26.5) but costs 5.5× as much to run the benchmark ($1561 vs $283; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Opus 5 (Low) when you need intelligence above 26.5, and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL when 26.5 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5 (Low) | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.4 | 26.5 | −32.7% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 32.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,560.91 | $282.51 | −81.9% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 81.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.31s | 6.33s | −44.0% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 44.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $0.23 / $0.57 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Claude Opus 5 (Low): 32.7% less intelligence, 81.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 44.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 5 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Claude Opus 5 (Low)Nemotron 3.5 Super VLToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-low/nemotron-3-5-super-vl · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-low/nemotron-3-5-super-vl?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill