Claude Opus 5 (Low) vs QwQ 32B

Claude Opus 5 (Low) vs QwQ 32B. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Opus 5 (Low)Off the frontier
Intelligence
39.40
Total cost
$1561
AlibabaQwQ 32BNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
9.50
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Opus 5 (Low)QwQ 32BDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)39.49.5−75.9% QwQ 32B is 75.9% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$1,560.91Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)11.37sNot reported— not comparable
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$5.00 / $25.0—
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Opus 5 (Low): what beats itQwQ 32B: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-low/qwq-32b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-low/qwq-32b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill