Claude Opus 5 (Medium) vs Mistral Large 4 Preview
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 5 (Medium) by Anthropic or Mistral Large 4 Preview by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Opus 5 (Medium) scores 6.4 points higher (44.8 vs 38.4) but costs 1.7× as much to run the benchmark ($2732 vs $1608; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Claude Opus 5 (Medium) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Mistral Large 4 Preview.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5 (Medium) | Mistral Large 4 Preview | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 44.8 | 38.4 | −14.3% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 14.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,731.91 | $1,607.86 | −41.1% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 41.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 13.14s | 27.12s | +106.4% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 106.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $1.36 / $4.18 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Mistral Large 4 Preview vs Claude Opus 5 (Medium): 14.3% less intelligence, 41.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 106.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 5 (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- Mistral Large 4 Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Claude Opus 5 (Medium)Mistral Large 4 PreviewToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-medium/mistral-large-4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-medium/mistral-large-4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill