Claude Opus 5 (Medium) vs Muse Glimmer (High)
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 5 (Medium) by Anthropic or Muse Glimmer (High) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Opus 5 (Medium) scores 27.3 points higher (44.8 vs 17.5) but costs 19× as much to run the benchmark ($2732 vs $146; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Opus 5 (Medium) when you need intelligence above 17.5, and Muse Glimmer (High) when 17.5 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5 (Medium) | Muse Glimmer (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 44.8 | 17.5 | −60.9% Muse Glimmer (High) is 60.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,731.91 | $145.77 | −94.7% Muse Glimmer (High) is 94.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.70s | 24.76s | +95.0% Muse Glimmer (High) is 95.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Muse Glimmer (High) vs Claude Opus 5 (Medium): 60.9% less intelligence, 94.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 95.0% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 5 (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- Muse Glimmer (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
Claude Opus 5 (Medium)Muse Glimmer (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-medium/muse-glimmer · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-medium/muse-glimmer?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill