Claude Opus 5 (Medium) vs Qwen3.7 Max
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 5 (Medium) by Anthropic or Qwen3.7 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Opus 5 (Medium) scores 15.3 points higher (44.8 vs 29.5) but costs 1.2× as much to run the benchmark ($2732 vs $2277; both flagship class). Pick Claude Opus 5 (Medium) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.7 Max.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5 (Medium) | Qwen3.7 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 44.8 | 29.5 | −34.2% Qwen3.7 Max is 34.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,731.91 | $2,277.12 | −16.6% Qwen3.7 Max is 16.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 13.14s | 16.61s | +26.4% Qwen3.7 Max is 26.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $2.50 / $7.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Qwen3.7 Max vs Claude Opus 5 (Medium): 34.2% less intelligence, 16.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 26.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 5 (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- Qwen3.7 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
Claude Opus 5 (Medium)Qwen3.7 MaxToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-medium/qwen3-7-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-medium/qwen3-7-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill