Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh) vs Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh) by Anthropic or Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh) scores 40.8 points higher (49.7 vs 8.9) but costs 400× as much to run the benchmark ($5868 vs $14.7; flagship vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 8.9, and Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) when 8.9 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh) | Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 49.7 | 8.9 | −82.1% Gemma 4 E4B (Reasonin… is 82.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $5,867.76 | $14.68 | −99.7% Gemma 4 E4B (Reasonin… is 99.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 35.31s | 57.75s | +63.6% Gemma 4 E4B (Reasonin… is 63.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $0.02 / $0.10 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) vs Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh): 82.1% less intelligence, 99.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 63.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh)Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-xhigh/gemma-4-e4b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-xhigh/gemma-4-e4b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill