Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh) vs Grok 4.7 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh) by Anthropic or Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh) scores 3.3 points higher (49.7 vs 46.4) but costs 1.2× as much to run the benchmark ($5868 vs $4967; both flagship class). Pick Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Grok 4.7 (Xhigh).
| Metric | Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh) | Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 49.7 | 46.4 | −6.6% Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) is 6.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $5,867.76 | $4,967.35 | −15.3% Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) is 15.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 35.31s | 45.88s | +29.9% Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) is 29.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) vs Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh): 6.6% less intelligence, 15.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 29.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh)Grok 4.7 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-xhigh/grok-4-7 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-xhigh/grok-4-7?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill