Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh) vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh) by Anthropic or MiMo-V2.6-Pro by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh) scores 3.4 points higher (49.7 vs 46.3) but costs 28× as much to run the benchmark ($5868 vs $207; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 46.3, and MiMo-V2.6-Pro when 46.3 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 49.7 | 46.3 | −6.8% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 6.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $5,867.76 | $206.66 | −96.5% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 96.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 35.31s | 48.29s | +36.8% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 36.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $0.43 / $0.87 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh): 6.8% less intelligence, 96.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 36.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh)MiMo-V2.6-ProToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-xhigh/mimo-v2-6-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-xhigh/mimo-v2-6-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill