Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh) vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh) by Anthropic or Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh) scores 4.6 points higher (49.7 vs 45.1) but costs 3.5× as much to run the benchmark ($5868 vs $1655; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 45.1, and Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) when 45.1 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh) | Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 49.7 | 45.1 | −9.3% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 9.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $5,867.76 | $1,655.27 | −71.8% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 71.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 40.34s | 29.43s | −27.0% Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is 27.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) vs Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh): 9.3% less intelligence, 71.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 27.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh)Muse Spark 1.3 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-xhigh/muse-spark-1-3-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-xhigh/muse-spark-1-3-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill