Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh) vs Muse Wonder (Max)
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh) by Anthropic or Muse Wonder (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Muse Wonder (Max)
Muse Wonder (Max) vs Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh): 5.4% more intelligence, 1.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 24.3% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh) | Muse Wonder (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 49.7 | 52.4 | +5.4% Muse Wonder (Max) is 5.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $5,867.76 | $5,786.78 | −1.4% Muse Wonder (Max) is 1.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 37.50s | 46.63s | +24.3% Muse Wonder (Max) is 24.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- Muse Wonder (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh)Muse Wonder (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-xhigh/muse-wonder · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-xhigh/muse-wonder?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill