Claude Opus 5 (Max) vs GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)

Claude Opus 5 (Max) vs GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Opus 5 (Max)Off the frontier
Intelligence
50.80
Total cost
$7275
Z AIGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
22.40
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Opus 5 (Max)GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)50.822.4−55.9% GLM-5.2 (Non-reasonin… is 55.9% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$7,274.74Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)63.35s3.92s−93.8% GLM-5.2 (Non-reasonin… is 93.8% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$5.00 / $25.0$1.40 / $4.40
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Opus 5 (Max): what beats itGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5/glm-5-2-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5/glm-5-2-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill