Claude Opus 5 (Max) vs GPT-6 Luna (Low)
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 5 (Max) by Anthropic or GPT-6 Luna (Low) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Opus 5 (Max) scores 29.3 points higher (50.8 vs 21.5) but costs 684× as much to run the benchmark ($7275 vs $10.6; flagship vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Opus 5 (Max) when you need intelligence above 21.5, and GPT-6 Luna (Low) when 21.5 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5 (Max) | GPT-6 Luna (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 50.8 | 21.5 | −57.7% GPT-6 Luna (Low) is 57.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $7,274.74 | $10.63 | −99.9% GPT-6 Luna (Low) is 99.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 50.36s | 6.60s | −86.9% GPT-6 Luna (Low) is 86.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Luna (Low) vs Claude Opus 5 (Max): 57.7% less intelligence, 99.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 86.9% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 5 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- GPT-6 Luna (Low) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Claude Opus 5 (Max)GPT-6 Luna (Low)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5/gpt-6-luna-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5/gpt-6-luna-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill