Claude Opus 5 (Max) vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 5 (Max) by Anthropic or Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Opus 5 (Max) scores 25.0 points higher (50.8 vs 25.8) but costs 7.3× as much to run the benchmark ($7275 vs $993; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Opus 5 (Max) when you need intelligence above 25.8, and Kimi K2.7 Code when 25.8 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5 (Max) | Kimi K2.7 Code | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 50.8 | 25.8 | −49.2% Kimi K2.7 Code is 49.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $7,274.74 | $992.88 | −86.4% Kimi K2.7 Code is 86.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 50.36s | 46.75s | −7.2% Kimi K2.7 Code is 7.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $0.95 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Kimi K2.7 Code vs Claude Opus 5 (Max): 49.2% less intelligence, 86.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 7.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 5 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
Claude Opus 5 (Max)Kimi K2.7 CodeToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5/kimi-k2-7-code · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5/kimi-k2-7-code?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill