Claude Opus 5 (Max) vs Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 5 (Max) by Anthropic or Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Opus 5 (Max) scores 39.5 points higher (50.8 vs 11.3) but costs 171× as much to run the benchmark ($7275 vs $42.5; flagship vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Opus 5 (Max) when you need intelligence above 11.3, and Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) when 11.3 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5 (Max) | Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 50.8 | 11.3 | −77.8% Mistral Small 4 (Reas… is 77.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $7,274.74 | $42.50 | −99.4% Mistral Small 4 (Reas… is 99.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 50.36s | 14.50s | −71.2% Mistral Small 4 (Reas… is 71.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) vs Claude Opus 5 (Max): 77.8% less intelligence, 99.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 71.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 5 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
Claude Opus 5 (Max)Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5/mistral-small-4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5/mistral-small-4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill