Claude Opus 5 (Max) vs Solar Pro 3
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 5 (Max) by Anthropic or Solar Pro 3 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Opus 5 (Max) scores 43.0 points higher (50.8 vs 7.8) but costs 46× as much to run the benchmark ($7275 vs $159; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Opus 5 (Max) when you need intelligence above 7.8, and Solar Pro 3 when 7.8 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5 (Max) | Solar Pro 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 50.8 | 7.8 | −84.6% Solar Pro 3 is 84.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $7,274.74 | $159.22 | −97.8% Solar Pro 3 is 97.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 49.99s | 18.89s | −62.2% Solar Pro 3 is 62.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Solar Pro 3 vs Claude Opus 5 (Max): 84.6% less intelligence, 97.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 62.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 5 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- Solar Pro 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
Claude Opus 5 (Max)Solar Pro 3Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5/solar-pro-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5/solar-pro-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill