Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Max) vs GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)

Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Max) vs GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Sonnet 4.6 (Max)Off the frontier
Intelligence
30.10
Total cost
$4925
Z AIGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
22.40
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Sonnet 4.6 (Max)GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)30.122.4−25.6% GLM-5.2 (Non-reasonin… is 25.6% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$4,924.80Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)115.26s3.83s−96.7% GLM-5.2 (Non-reasonin… is 96.7% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$3.00 / $15.0$1.40 / $4.40
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Sonnet 4.6 (Max): what beats itGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-4-6-adaptive/glm-5-2-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-4-6-adaptive/glm-5-2-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill