Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Max) vs Grok 4.7 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Max) by Anthropic or Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) scores 16.3 points higher (46.4 vs 30.1) but costs 1.0× as much to run the benchmark ($4967 vs $4925; both flagship class). Pick Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Max).
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Max) | Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 30.1 | 46.4 | +54.2% Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) is 54.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $4,924.80 | $4,967.35 | +0.9% Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) is 0.9% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 104.36s | 46.09s | −55.8% Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) is 55.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $3.00 / $15.0 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Max): 54.2% more intelligence, 0.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 55.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Max)Grok 4.7 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-4-6-adaptive/grok-4-7 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-4-6-adaptive/grok-4-7?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill