Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Max) vs Grok 4.7 (Low)
Which is better for the money: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Max) by Anthropic or Grok 4.7 (Low) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Grok 4.7 (Low)
Grok 4.7 (Low) vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Max): 40.2% more intelligence, 66.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 85.0% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Max) | Grok 4.7 (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 30.1 | 42.2 | +40.2% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 40.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $4,924.80 | $1,630.69 | −66.9% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 66.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 75.21s | 11.28s | −85.0% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 85.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $3.00 / $15.0 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- Grok 4.7 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Max)Grok 4.7 (Low)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-4-6-adaptive/grok-4-7-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-4-6-adaptive/grok-4-7-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill