Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Max) vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Which is better for the money: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Max) by Anthropic or Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Max) scores 4.3 points higher (30.1 vs 25.8) but costs 5.0× as much to run the benchmark ($4925 vs $993; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Max) when you need intelligence above 25.8, and Kimi K2.7 Code when 25.8 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Max) | Kimi K2.7 Code | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 30.1 | 25.8 | −14.3% Kimi K2.7 Code is 14.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $4,924.80 | $992.88 | −79.8% Kimi K2.7 Code is 79.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 75.21s | 46.75s | −37.8% Kimi K2.7 Code is 37.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $3.00 / $15.0 | $0.95 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Kimi K2.7 Code vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Max): 14.3% less intelligence, 79.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 37.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Max)Kimi K2.7 CodeToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-4-6-adaptive/kimi-k2-7-code · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-4-6-adaptive/kimi-k2-7-code?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill