Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Max) vs MiniMax-M2.1
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Max) vs MiniMax-M2.1. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Max) | MiniMax-M2.1 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 30.1 | 20.9 | −30.6% MiniMax-M2.1 is 30.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $4,924.80 | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 115.26s | 44.43s | −61.5% MiniMax-M2.1 is 61.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $3.00 / $15.0 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-4-6-adaptive/minimax-m2-1 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-4-6-adaptive/minimax-m2-1?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill