Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low) vs DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25)
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low) vs DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low) | DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 23.3 | 13.1 | −43.8% DeepSeek R1 0528 (May… is 43.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 10.79s | 71.13s | +559.2% DeepSeek R1 0528 (May… is 559.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $3.00 / $15.0 | $1.85 / $2.75 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-4-6-non-reasoning-low-effort/deepseek-r1 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-4-6-non-reasoning-low-effort/deepseek-r1?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill