Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low) vs DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24)

Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low) vs DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
23.30
Total cost
-
DeepSeekDeepSeek V3 (Dec '24)Off the frontier
Intelligence
8.50
Total cost
$25.4
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low)DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)23.38.5−63.5% DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) is 63.5% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$25.37— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)10.79s12.35s+14.5% DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) is 14.5% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$3.00 / $15.0$0.32 / $0.89
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low): what beats itDeepSeek V3 (Dec '24): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-4-6-non-reasoning-low-effort/deepseek-v3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-4-6-non-reasoning-low-effort/deepseek-v3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill