Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low) vs DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning)

Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low) vs DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
23.30
Total cost
-
DeepSeekDeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
13.70
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low)DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)23.313.7−41.2% DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-re… is 41.2% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)10.79s6.47s−40.0% DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-re… is 40.0% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$3.00 / $15.0$0.56 / $1.68
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, Low): what beats itDeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-4-6-non-reasoning-low-effort/deepseek-v3-1 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-4-6-non-reasoning-low-effort/deepseek-v3-1?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill